<html><head>
<style id="css_styles">
blockquote.cite { margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right:0px; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc }
blockquote.cite2 {margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right:0px; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 0px; }
a img { border: 0px; }
li[style='text-align: center;'], li[style='text-align: right;'] { list-style-position: inside;}
body { font-family: Segoe UI; font-size: 12pt; }
</style>
</head>
<body>H all,<div>Yes, I agree with Richard too, live streaming of scanner audio is killing the hobby in the USofA and aren't the scanner listeners grizzling about it! But they were the instigators and now they are paying for it. Unfortunately they forced the 'legal' users of the communication systems into making encoding/encryption but as soon as a new 'disguise' is used the scanner manufacturers are more or less obliged to develop a decoding algorithm. </div><div>It is to our benefit that we have these laws about disclosure of what we hear. If journalists want to listen as well so that they can go 'ambulance chasing' then hopefully they will get pinged one day so that we don't suffer the same consequences as in the US. It will only need one good court case to show that the information received was used to give the journo an advantage and then give him/her a hefty fine to prove the point.</div><div>Best regards - Martin.</div></body></html>